Showing posts with label Leah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leah. Show all posts

19 Apr 2013

The Halcyon Days of Motoring (and why you’ve probably missed them)

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication,” said Leonardo da Vinci.  A creed that seems to have been ignored by modern car manufacturers and many consumers.   @LeahRebeccaUK wonders if we've strayed too far from Leonardo's observation.

Not long ago in a galaxy not far away, driving in the UK was a fun, stress-free and enjoyable past-time. You’re giggling, aren’t you? No, it really was. Imagine that roads did not have pot-holes large enough to swallow Minis whole, that there was no such thing as a speed camera and, oh yes, that there was about 80% less traffic on them then now.

And no such thing as road-rage. Or traffic jams. Gone. Simply. Didn’t. Exist. Still giggling? Thought not. Now imagine a universe (does that sound a bit Carl Sagan? Never mind) where if you did ever break down anywhere, that the sight of a car with its bonnet up at the side of the road would guarantee that some kind soul would stop, whether you were a fella or a girl - and usually within ten minutes, ask what the problem was and, between the two of you, be able to figure where to put the plaster and you’d be happily on your way again.

Imagine all this, however difficult, because motoring in days gone by was really like this. And I don’t think we’ll see them again. And no, I’m not that old.

I can remember getting a lift into college once a week in a friends Morris Minor (I say my friends, actually I think it was his Mother's, but I digress), which was always a bit of an 'experience’ (the car journeys - not his Mother). I remember him casually announcing one day that the heater had stopped working. To be honest, I didn’t like him enough to offer to fix it, which meant that every winter I had to attack the ice that had built up on the inside of the windows with a lighter and scraper so that he could actually see where we were going. I felt this quite important.

This wasn’t a problem in summer however, which is when he’d usually adjust the windscreen washers so that they pointed sideways, enabling him to soak people at bus-stops (girls, usually), cyclists, other cars (especially the police), and general passers-by without fear of us ever being tasered or receiving death-threats, because everyone took it as it was intended to be taken - which was a bit a cheeky fun. Just that. A laugh. A giggle (please don’t google giggle).

It sometimes feels that ‘having fun’ is something which was made illegal a few years ago in the U.K, but at that time it definitely wasn’t. Definitely. Yes, motoring has indeed changed a great deal in the last thirty years, but maybe not as much as the people, our attitudes, and the world in which we live has.

The Pace of Technology

The first car I ever owned, and indeed passed my test in (six lessons, one test - ha!) was a Ford Cortina MkII estate, and this would be around ‘82. I think it may once have been red. Strangely, and not by design, the next four cars I owned after that were also all MkII Cortinas; Blue. All of them; (a 1600 auto - yuk, a 1600 ‘deluxe’ (I think it had an ashtray), the obligatory 1600E and finally, the much rarer 1500GT - something I didn’t know at the time #bugger) and I remember them all with great fondness.

I miss polishing the chrome most, and that took about three hours. Also that 1600cc crossflow engine was easy to get to and work on, and I never had a breakdown that I couldn’t fix at the side of the road. However, a friend at the time had a yellow (I rather like yellow cars) MkI Escort 1600, and I coveted it badly. I would have swapped them all for it, and it wasn’t just because of the colour.

There was just ‘something’ about how it looked, and I remember how nimble and agile it felt to drive, even compared to my Cortina. Perhaps that Escorts seemed to win everything on the RAC and world rallies at one time slightly clouded my judgement about them, but it honestly felt like you could just throw anything at it, and it’d be able to handle it all with graceful fun aplomb.

Driving it was fun, but then, driving anything was fun! And cheap. Fuel was cheap and insurance was cheap and sometimes, if unable to sleep, I’d jump in the car and drive to Brighton from Surrey, just for something to do and to blow out the cobwebs. At three in the morning. Ok, so maybe Im a bit odd, but there was just something special about driving back then.

Everyone helped everyone else. Motorists had a comradery now only enjoyed by bikers. You had a safety net, and the roads were a safe place to be. I’ll tell you something now, as a young girl driving the roads of Surrey and West Sussex (I’ve always been very independent) I never once felt threatened by anyone or by anything that happened on the roads. I never felt intimidated, and back then I used to drive on my own a lot.

And do you know why? We were all nice to each-other, we all helped each other, and everyone seemed to know how to drive, ride, and have fun. Driver aids? Uhm no, not really. The only driving aids available were a “Smiths” aftermarket stick-on rear screen heater, some wooden bead affair you could tie to the back of your seats to improve your posture (or something), a nasty vinyl steering-wheel cover to match your nasty vinyl seats, and a compass you could attach to your windscreen if you were a scout. That’s it. And know what? We were happy.

Rose-tinted Memories

It’s funny how we remember things, isn’t it? Maybe much depends on how we want to...

A few years ago now I had the opportunity to drive a MkI Escort again (now worth a lot of money). For a weekend no less, and wow was I looking forward to it. Even though it wasn’t yellow. (See? I’m versatile.)

But something went very wrong right from the outset and it was somehow not quite how I’d remembered it to be. I climbed aboard and immediately noticed that some idiot had fitted a steering-wheel from a truck, stolen the dashboard, moved the pedals much closer together, and halved the glass area and cabin space.

Oh dear, oh very dear. I peered suspiciously at a control marked “Choke" and realised quickly that I’d forgotten just how basic old cars actually are. Very soon, I was also reminded how terrible the heating, lighting and ventilation systems are, followed by how very damn loud they are (four-speed box, remember), and finally how much they shake should you try to take them on a motorway. (Just don’t - trust me on this one).

It felt like I was sitting in a steel box that had some windows in it and a washing machine in the boot, full of bricks and on full spin. The steering nimbleness and handling I’d remembered had somehow disappeared into a rose-tinted haze and I actually wondered if the front tyres were flat. Or even present.

Oh yes - no servo-assisted steering, ah. My arms started hurting. As soon did my right leg - it felt like the brake servo was broken too with the amount of effort needed on the middle pedal before much started happening. And my god, did it roll! It almost felt French!

That agile rally-winning pocket rocket from my past had somehow tranformed into a monster whose rear suspension had been replaced with something similar to pogo-sticks and a space-hopper. Oh yes, I remember now. Leaf-springs - hmmm. Let’s just say it was 'bouncy’ at the rear (the car, not me), that it had vague woolly steering, and that it always wanted to oversteer.

It was a proper handful and, without the benefit of servo-assisted convenience and progress, I’d forgotten just how much effort you had to put into simply driving (and stopping) the things, and I was utterly exhausted.

I’d eventually got the hang of it (read, I can be a stubborn cow), but it was the amount of effort you had to put into the controls before they actually seemed to work that I’d forgotten - or that our progress had made me forget. There was nothing really wrong with that Escort, and my observations were in comparison to a more ‘modern’ car (The Puma) #seewhatididthere - that’s just how older cars feel to drive, but the point is I’d forgotten all this because I’d been spoiled by the progress of a technology that we’ve all taken for granted and gotten so accustomed to. Well, that and a poor memory, maybe. Oh, and I don’t want to own a MkI Escort anymore, thank you. No, not even a yellow one.

But where to stop

Most of my girlfriends do, eventually, learn to put up with the fact that I like cars. They think I’m I bit weird maybe, but they put up with it. It does also sometimes come in handy. Lots of them have asked me for advice, which I’m always happy to give. Some of their parents have now also too, which I’m also delighted to give. However, there are some of them who drive, and with whom I’ll never get into a car, again. (You know - the sort of people who’ll happily drive a car while ‘driving a car’ is, apparently, thirteenth on their list of things they should be doing).

People like that behind a wheel scare me a lot, and it was one of these who called me the other month to say her Mum had just bought a new car, and that it was brilliant and that I’d love ‘it’. On asking what ‘it’ was, she said her Mum couldn’t remember (‘it’ is a Vauxhall - I really don’t love it) but that it was brilliant because it would heat the steering-wheel, gear selector and hand-brake for you when it was cold. And this was brilliant, right?

This person had bought a new car and had decided on this model because it had this feature. There might well have been quite a long pause. I think I was biting through my bottom lip, having not quite decided whether to laugh or cry, ergo avoiding having to commit. (This is the stuff of quantum physics, you know!?) “Uhm.. have you never heard of gloves?” I remember thinking later, would have been an excellent thing to say at this point. (I can always think of brilliant retorts - anywhere between five minutes to five days after the event, which does tend to blunt its effectiveness a tad.) But this also got me thinking (and you may want to run).

With modern cars now having more and more technology aboard - seemingly whether we want it or not - is there now not a danger of that technology getting in the way of driving the things, rather than making it easier? Or cosseting us to such a degree that we become numbed to the responsibilities of driving properly or even safely? Now don’t get me wrong, here. I believe that there has been a vast number of improvements made cars over the past twenty-five years or so, that do indeed save lives and also makes our time easier behind the wheel. I need a list here (it’s ok, I’ve got crayons) and it’s not very long.

Dual-circuit braking systems, ABS, power assisted steering, Impact crumple-zones, Anti-dive seats, Seatbelt pre-tensioners, Airbags, and Engine Management Systems.

These are, I feel, THE big and effective changes which made progresses to vehicles over the past twenty-years. And don’t worry - whatever you are driving, they’re on your car right now. (Unless you’ve an Escort MkI). Not a long list, is it? It took me about a year to get used to ABS because years of driving without it rather got you used to the fact that you could brake hard - or you could steer, but not both at the same time.

Very importantly,having ABS, or any of these systems, didn’t change how I drove. Knowing I could be doing an emergency stop while steering never made me drive more quickly or more recklessly just because I knew the system was there. It was just a safety-net. A way to control my car more safely, especially in extreme conditions. Something which made me, and the people around me, less likely to come to harm.

Progress for whom, exactly?

I’m not, but if I were in the market for a new car today as well as the systems listed above, I’d probably find it to have the following fitted too; Parking Sensors, Parking Assist, Electronic Stability Control, Emergency Brake Assist, Traction Control, Automatic lights, Automatic wipers, I-Drive (or similar), Automatic collision avoidance system, Electronic hand-brake, and an In-car Internet and Wifi connectivity system. Oh yes, not forgetting the “keep your handies warm if it’s cold” system, as fitted by Vauxhall on their brilliant cars.

Good bloody grief. I have a problem with many of those systems and I’m going to be controversial now. I don’t want 'em. Not a one. I can reverse park, I can brake, and I know when to turn my lights and wipers on, thank-you (told you I was independent).

The day I need a bloody computer to tell me I’m not braking hard enough not to hit the car in front, is the day I’ll hand in my keys for good. I’d notice that all by myself, honestly I would! I’ve actually got most those systems in my car, anyway. I call them my feet, my hands, my eyes and my brain and they all work very well, thanks (I’ve been tested, and everything).

If you want to check your Facebook page, or update your Twitter feeds while you’re driving a car, I’d really rather prefer that you wern’t on the same roads as me. If you don’t bother to look where you’re going very often - mainly because you know that if anything does get in the way, you know the computer will get you out of any trouble, then I also don’t want you on the same roads as me.

If you seriously want to travel safely about the land with your face glued to your phone or tablet, or if you have the attention span of the lesser-spotted wombat, there is already a very safe transportation system in place for you, and everyone around you. It’s called a train, a taxi, or a bus. Your place really is not behind the wheel of a car.

The closest I’ve come to an accident recently was when I noticed a BMW driving down the centre of a road at me. The driver was not looking out of his window at all, and it took a parp of my horn to promote any change. As he passed, he held up a hand in apology, wound down the passenger window, and said he’d been trying to adjust something, and that he hadn’t noticed me. My car is yellow, looks like a migraine on wheels, and he hadn’t noticed me. Why he felt the need to do this on the fly, I’ve no idea and simply cannot comprehend. But because cars can do stuff like this now, things like this will happen more and more. Progress? Really?

There are a couple more things you’ll get with a new car these days too. If you’re very lucky, you’ll get a spacesaving emergency wheel, and if you’re not, you’ll have a hole where you used to have a spare tyre, and somewhere in that hole will be a can or two of something to squirt into your punctured tyre to repair and inflate it, which the AA says 70% of the time doesn’t work. In what possible way of measuring, is this progress!?

Spacesaver wheels - which are pretty expensive and have a maximum safe speed rating of just 40 mph, came about because manufacturers told us it meant we had more luggage room, and we bought it. Well, you lot did - mine has a full-size spare and alloy wheel. If you’ve not driven on a spacesaver, let me tell you now that they feel horrible and dangerous to drive on - especially on the front. Imagine putting a bicycle wheel on your car, and expecting it to feel the same as it did before. Not going to happen. You can’t help but think that both of these things were driven by costs and convenience to the manufacturers - not for you as a driver, at all. And this is progress, right?

I wonder how long will it be before all new cars are fitted with a ‘black box’ recorder device? Something which will notice you pulled a ‘g’ in that last corner, something that noticed you’d driven at 43mph in a 40, and then decided it ought to inform your insurance company about it? Or the police?

Oh, it’s coming I’d bet, whether you like it or not. So where does all this leave drivers like me? Proper old-school drivers, who learned how to cadence brake, and how to drive in the snow and to control a skid, because our cars had no other way of doing it other than us learning how? Right now, I drive a car which is eleven years old. It has everything on it I need and want in a car, and that’s not much. In the way of driver-aids, it has ABS, it has traction-control, and it has aircon, and that’s about it.

Because it’s a 'modern’ car, its lights, ventilation and heating systems all work just fine. When it rains, I notice it’s raining, and I turn the wipers on. And when it gets dark, I notice it’s gone dark, and I’ll turn the lights on so that I can see. That’s worked pretty well for me for the past thirty-odd years, and so I think I’m happy sticking to what I know, which is to drive a car that doesn’t interfere (or try to help) with my driving of it.

We’ve already got something here in the UK that tells us what to do all the time, and what’s best for us. It’s called “The Government" and I’m not much of a fan of that, either. I certainly don’t want my car to start joining in.





3 Feb 2013

Living with (and loving) - Ford Puma - Part 2

@LeahRebeccaUK writes about her Ford Puma.  This is quite long (and funny) so sit down, make a brew and enjoy. Part 1 is here

The Ford Puma (And my love affair with it) 

Part 2
Living with a Puma 

It’s not really a two-plus-two because the rear seats are actually usable and comfortable, although it is a little dark back there. My first Puma and I parted after I’d owned it for nine years - far and away a record for me, and even then my only reason for selling was that it was going to need some sills and some welding and quite a lot of money to get it through the MOT. I’d also decided by then that it needed bigger brakes and a few other bits and pieces, most of which were standard on later version Puma, so why bother. 

So, sadly, I didn’t. In those nine years and 69,000 miles, it let me down twice. Just twice. Once was the battery when it lost a cell, but as this was the cars original from the factory and died when I’d had the car five years, I can’t moan. The other time was the starter-motor, which suddenly got tight and seized when I’d gone over 110,000 miles. And here we come to the other reason I love Pumas. They give so much, yet are very cheap to keep on the road. 

Most suspension and engine parts are from a Fiesta, and therefore easy to source and inexpensive. Whatever you’re driving right now, I bet a new half-decent tyre will cost you £80 a corner, yes? I can get a 195/50.15 for £46. It adds up, you see. Or rather, it doesn’t. And because Pumas were fitted with decent immobilisers insurance companies quite like them, and only put them in group 12. I’ve found that a Puma is cheap to run, cheap to insure, and cheap for parts and work. 

You simply cannot go wrong. I won’t begin to list the exotic machinery I’ve embarrassed in my Puma, but believe me when I say that this list is long and distinguished. To get past me on roads I know, you’ll need to be in something like a Porsche Boxter S and yes, I’m being quite serious. A Puma punches way above its weight, and very often, wins.

To summarise 

It’s not perfect.  It was designed in a real hurry on a computer and, as such, has a couple of issues. One of these you’ll discover when you first open the tailgate in the rain.  What happens is, you fill the boot with about a litre of water. You can get around this easily by learning to open it very slowly, giving the gutters a chance to clear. Get used to that and you’ll be fine.

Next, the headlights are very beautiful to look at - being the first projector headlights out there, but have a problem insofar as they don’t actually work very well as headlights. I spent a lot of money trying different bulbs until I found something which meant I could see at night, which is quite important! The high beams are fantastic but you’ll need to upgrade the low beam standard ones and also they’re not standard UK fittings so it’s a bit of a faff.

Do NOT do what I did and chose a Puma without aircon! The glass area is large, only the front windows open, and due to an oversight in the mirror design (later rectified) opening the windows in a Puma while moving doesn’t fill your face - or the cabin, with air. What happens in summer is you cook. It can become unbearable and it really isn’t something you can live with.

Everything is Fiesta inside, plus some shiny bits. The cabin is functional yet practical and is a pretty place to be at night. Remember a Puma is a pretty basic machine, but that’s one of the attractions, also. No trip computers, no driver aids, it just lets you get on with driving it. One shiny bit to mention is the beautiful, solid aluminium, gear selector made from a solid block, which will freeze your hand to in winter, and burn in summer. Be warned!

You’ll go through front brake flexi’s (consider armoured ones as they’ll save you money) and Pumas inherit a problem from its sister Fiesta in that the heater control valves is prone to fail and need replacing - just make sure you do so with a Ford one, or it’ll last a week.

And that’s about it, really. I’ve recently got my second Puma and honestly, unless Ford stop mucking about and build a new EuroPuma (please don’t give it a guppy mouth if you do, though!), there’s nothing out there I’d rather have, and certainly offering the bang per buck.

The views here are, of course, personal and my own, but in these days of driver assist and computer control, I’d rather have my hands on something I control. Something which talks to me and lets me know what’s going on. I’ll stick with my Puma. Oh yes - that’s something else I’ve noticed. It’s always “The Puma”. I’ve never done that before, it’s always just been ”the car”. The only other people I know do this are Jag owners, and that’s not bad company, eh!?

Do you want one? 

The only Puma to consider is the 1.7, and there are plenty out there. You also need to know that most of them have the wrong oil in, needing a special semi-synthetic due to its nikasil bores and to run the variable valve timing properly, and not a lot of people know that (did you do the voice?) so stuff them full of the standard zetec stuff. 

This is not good and will need sorting asap. Also most of them out there will be showing rusty arches cancer, something caused mainly by the stuff Ford packed the arches with to help with sound absorption, which sadly also retains water. With so many of them out there, I’m amazed that someone hasn’t started a service offering to sort this (hint). The standard 1.7 Pumas had cloth seats and a decent hifi and a cassette deck and radio. All have traction control and ABS. Later ones had a better spec and more toys, as well as the special additions. You have a choice of;

Puma Thunder 

Quantity Produced: 1000 each in Moondust Silver and Magnum Grey

Quantity Remaining: 1,769 as of 2011

Years available: 2000(X) to 2002(52)

These were among the final 2000 Pumas produced. Although Moondust Silver was available throughout the whole of the Puma's production run, Magnum Grey was only available on the Thunder Edition. All of the Thunder editions featured a 'Midnight Black' (dark grey) leather interior, 6 disc CD changer and multispoke alloys similar to those featured on the Fiesta Zetec-S.

Puma Black 

Quantity Produced: 1600

Quantity Remaining: 1,381 as of 2011

Years available: 2000(X) to 2001(51)

The Puma Black featured a 'Midnight Black' (dark grey) leather interior, Panther Black paintwork and Ford's 'F1' style alloys. The original quantity of the Puma Black was meant to be only 1000, but as the edition proved to be popular, an additional 600 were produced.

Millennium Puma 

Quantity Produced: 1000

Quantity Remaining: 755 as of 2011[4]

Years available: 1999(V) to 2000(X)

The Ford Millennium Edition cars were produced to commemorate the Millennium Products Award from the Design Council [5] in 1999 for being 'The first Ford in Britain designed solely on computer and in record time.' The Millennium Edition Puma featured eye catching Zinc Yellow paintwork, and an 'Alchemy Blue' (dark/navy blue) leather interior with Recaro seats. A numbered badge and keyring were available upon purchase from Ford, but the cars were not automatically numbered.

The Puma was the only car in Ford UK history that had a waiting list, and was still selling strongly when Ford stopped production, mainly because they were about to produce a new Fiesta and the Puma was based on the floorplan and running gear of their old one. I hope I’m wrong, but I have a feeling we’ll not see its like, again. The engine, made in Spain, shipped to Japan(!) for modification, then sent to Germany, where all Pumas were made. Madness, such wonderful madness, of which the world is currently bereft, in these soulless and auspicious times.

If you consider yourself any sort of petrolhead, and you’ve not driven one of these yet, you need to do so - simples. I’ve never been so impressed with a car before and I love the things so much I’d still probably have one in my ideal three-car garage. Only that would be an FRP and that’s only a dream, but maybe one day, huh? I sometimes wish it had just a little more power, and people suggest putting a two litre zetek in it, but the joy of that revvy 1.7 is what the Puma is all about, and I think that would spoil it, somehow. So I’ll leave it be and just enjoy the thing, and I bet if you see me I’ll be smiling ; ) 

2 Feb 2013

Living with (and loving) - Ford Puma

@LeahRebeccaUK writes about her Ford Puma.  This is quite long (and funny) so sit down, make a brew and enjoy

The Ford Puma (And my love affair with it) 

Part 1

Eleven years ago now I bought myself a Ford. I know - heady stuff. Therefore - and what I really mean is what I thought I was buying was; a reasonably capable, reasonably dynamic, and reasonably reliable, reasonable vehicle (sorry - I’ll stop saying that now). You know, something that would give me, at least, a few years of reasonably (oops) trouble-free motoring. And that’s exactly what I got, really. It was, after-all, a Ford. But I also discovered that I’d got more than that. I actually think I got a great deal more than that. You see, I’d bought myself a Puma, and it really surprised me. My little “Fiesta in a frock” actually still surprises me most times I drive it.  And when I do drive it I’ve nearly always got this big, stupid grin on my face (this might just be me, though). And if you’re sitting comfortably, I’ll begin to tell you why…

An introduction

For a girlie, I guess I know a lot about cars and engineering. I will quantify that. I drove my first car aged 8 (sitting on my Fathers lap). Morris Oxford, before you ask (shuddup - I’m old). But the Oxford, or the Anglia, or the Rover P6 (3500S in white), or the Opel Rekord, #noitwasntbloodyoliver or the whatever it was at the time, would break. Sometimes often. As a consequence, most weekends my Father would have to work on, (read, swear very loudly at), the car. I’m no tomboy, but science and engineering were always subjects which fascinated me, and still do. My parents lived smack bang between Redhill Aerodrome (Bristow Helicopters and the Tiger Club), and Gatwick Airport. 

How could I not notice engineering!? From the age of 10 I’d be interested in watching Dad work now and then.  By 11 I’d be helping, and by 12 I could drive on my own and was helping my Father regularly, while learning about cars. Well, about cars and swearing, more accurately. Anyhow, it must have set a precedent as, by age 20 I’d successfully served a four year mechanical engineering apprenticeship and become a qualified toolmaker (City & Guilds) Eight exams; all credits and distinctions (four of each). As I said, I guess I know a lot about engineering and cars, and that was about the time when I discovered that I might just actually be able to really drive the things, too.

Owners and drivers

There are, in my honest opinion, two main types of motorist at large in the UK. There are those who can very competently and safely pilot a car, and there are those of us who drive a vehicle as if it is almost an extension of ourselves. As if driving was an emotional thing, rather than just time spent while getting between the places you wanted to be. While some use their car with the same amount of interest and passion they would have while turning on their washing machine, I can’t do that. I just cannot drive a car feeling I’m just controlling a machine. For me anyway, it’s always been far more… involving than that.

Back to the Puma

I was working as a producer in local radio when the company suddenly noticed that I’d had use of the ‘pool car’ for a tad more than the “three months” I’d quoted. They were on the ‘phone and now wanted to know if I realised it had, in fact, been well over a year (yes), and they wanted to know when they could expect it back please, and absolutely no fluttering of eyelashes was going to help me. The car in question was a Hyundai 2.0l Coupe. The pretty one with four round headlights and a spoiler and everything. These always seemed only to be driven by other women whenever spied on the road, which I didn’t mind at all. Mine happened to have all the options and full black leather and was mailbox red. It may have saved me a lot of money with parking wardens etc, if not being noteworthy if poked with a stick, but it was going and that was that. It's flowing lines and comfy interior were, in fact, only spoiled by one small thing. It wasn’t actually very good. Oh, as a machine to comfortably transport you about the land, it was lovely. But it never challenged me as a driver. Not once. It either bored me, or scared me. It really didn’t like being driven with any real enthusiasm, was never rewarding if you did, and developed some rather nasty and unpredictable habits if really pushed. But hey, it was free and it looked pretty, and pretty is something that seems to be quite important to me, maybe more than most. An example? Vauxhall has produced only two cars which I’ve found attractive enough to consider owning. The Calibra, the current Astra VXR and, if it counts, the original Opel Manta. That’s it. What if I could find something curvy, like the Hyundai, but also reasonably (sorry) fun to drive? I had no need for anything commodious or exotic. I just wanted automotive fun. What I needed was a shortlist, and mine looked a lot like this;

Mazda MX-5, Honda Civic Type S/R, Ford Puma, Vauxhall Tigra (just kidding!)

VW Golf MkII, Seat Ibiza, MGTF, Audi A3.

Now before you all start looking for my marbles, let me say that I had already pretty-much discounted the MG immediately as, although I’d driven one and it was immense fun (No really it was, if you ignored the rattles. It was a bit less fun when the vct stopped working though, but hey!) I also had no desire to be having head-gaskets replaced on an annoyingly frequent basis. Looking at my list, I thought I’d be lucky to find a Golf that hadn’t been fiddled with too much, and I was wondering if I could live with how a Civic looks from the side (which, I think, is like a van), and started trawling through the ads. Of the cars listed here, the only two I’d never driven at that time were the MX-5 (have now, and it’s a brilliant little thing) and the A3 - although I’d only driven a 1.6 Puma before and only the Civic type-S and, in both cases, only very briefly. The first of these that I spied within my criteria was an Audi 1.8S in dark blue, which was being advertised by an independent dealership. I called, I went, and I drove.

My conclusions from the drive were pretty much what I’d expected from it. The Audi was beautifully well - made and exquisitely put together, with the cabin having a quality finish and feel. It wasn’t unpleasant to drive, it didn’t feel particularly fast, and the suspension managed to find bumps where I know there were none - although strangely it still rolled about in the bends. It managed to feel heavy. To summarise, I was driving what felt like a slightly larger, slightly upmarket and sadly, slightly softer alternative to a Golf. Hmmm. With more power and maybe Quattro, I imagine that these could be a lot of fun. But this one? Not for me, thank-you.

Nothing happened for a while, other than me going to see a couple of Golfs, both of which were not as advertised, with one male owner feeling the need to ask me if I actually knew anything about cars as he realised that I’d turned up to see it on my own, that I was a girl, and that I was under the bonnet of his car. *Sigh*

The next weekend seemed to be almost as much of a waste of time as, after a thorough trawl through the press and web, the only interest locally was a Puma 1.7 in green. I couldn’t remember seeing a green one before and it’s not a colour I’d normally choose. (See what I mean? I’m stupidly picky about such things. Another example of this is I think all cars with only one reversing and fog-light look really cheap, and it’d have to be something very special for me to be able to ignore that.) I nearly didn’t call at all but, for the lack of anything else to look at, I did and thirty minutes later I was crawling underneath an R reg, three and a bit year old Puma 1.7 in metallic dark green with 54k on the clock, a new MOT, and a fresh full factory service and new cambelt under its belt. 

First impressions were good and that green actually really suited the car. It was spotless underneath and the only blemish I could find anywhere on the body was a tiny dink under the driver’s door lock, looking like a heavy keyring had been dropped. This aside, it was spotless and looked (and smelt) brand-new. Hell, even the jack and tools had never been opened or used, and the exhaust was still the factory original. Popping the bonnet revealed that zetec 1.6 unit which those clever Yamaha chaps had kindly fiddled about with, only giving it back to Ford after fitting custom pistons and head, making it a 1.7, and drastically reducing the engines reciprocating mass. 

This I already knew, but hadn’t really thought it would make a very big difference to the standard 1.6 zetec unit in the Puma I’d already driven. Asking for a test drive, I climbed aboard in the passenger seat, as the male owner said he’d be delighted to take me for one. The only things I therefore really noticed on my test chauffeuring was that the passenger electric window rattled a bit if opened halfway (I now know they all do this), and that the suspension had not deflected in the slightest when the (really rather large) owner had climbed aboard. 

 The engine had started effortlessly - just as it had when I’d started it from cold earlier, and I noticed that it didn’t have aircon, which was a mistake (as I found out later) but at the time was what I wanted, and within a few miles it’d become clear that I was in the company of a car owner, rather than of a driver. This was all good news. I doubt if he took it above 4,000 rpm or used more than 40% throttle all journey and it purred like, well like a Puma so, as we pulled back into his drive I had already decided that I wanted it. After a bit of haggling, and me passing over £450 less than I thought I would be (it helps sometimes being a size 12 when negotiating with a man), I became the vehicle's second owner. And that’s when the fun started.

In the first week of ownership I didn’t really have much chance to play with my new toy much, mostly as it was pressed into immediate service taking me to or from work, which meant inner city traffic, which meant boring. However, it did give me the chance get to know it a bit better, to look at it and its reflection a lot, and to realise that they really are very curvy indeed. You’ll find two flat surfaces on a Puma, and they are the number plates. 

I found the brakes were very good, that the suspension was pretty taunt, that it was easy to drive, and that the C pillars are huge - meaning rear vision wasn’t very good. My only bug-bear was I was finding it a pain to get the driving position right, not something that usually takes more than a few seconds. You see, you drive a Puma one way - in a bum down, legs up attitude and altering the electric height adjustment of the seat, also adjusts the rake and entire attitude of the thing and takes some getting used to. A couple of times I thought I’d got it right, only to have to adjust it a few days later because the squab was cutting off the blood supply to my legs. 

Persevering with this though, will reward you with a driving position which is so perfect, that you feel like you are putting the car on, more than getting into it. I once had to drive from Coventry to Newcastle and back for a job interview. And sat beside me (at his request), was my 87 year-old father-in-law (at the time), who loved being driven in it. We both got out after a long, hot journey, having not stopped other than for fuel and his bladder, and I think we honestly both could have just climbed back in and done it again. Sorry, I digress. (I got the job, by the way.)

Righto, so I’d had the car slightly under a week, hadn’t had the chance to play with it yet, and was driving home from work on a Friday afternoon really looking forward to Saturday when my other half cheerily called to remind me that we’d agreed to drive down to visit my parents. In Surrey. I was lucky in one way as my (ex)partner didn’t really like driving, especially on motorways, but he was happily comfortable and confident with mine. But I was also beginning to get frustrated as motorway driving is usually a pretty un-exciting, mentally exhausting, and generally boring affair, and all I wanted was to get to know it better and take the thing by the scruff of the neck, and was now looking unlikely to be able to do so for a little bit longer. Nevertheless, the next morning it was loaded it up with our weekend stuff, filled full of fuel, and I pointed her (a Puma is female - she just is) in the general direction of the M40.

The journey down ‘sarf revealed that it honestly didn’t feel any differently when ‘heavy’ to when it had been running on fumes and that it simply refused to squat down at the rear when under hard acceleration, as front wheel drives usually do. It also hinted that I’d been wrong when thinking the 1.7 would feel like a 1.6. This felt much faster, being quicker and more eager to rev, while still having useful torque low down. First impressions were it felt more like a 2.0 litre! 

Long high-speed corners showed it didn’t roll much at all, and that only under very hard breaking was it possible to notice any movement at all in the suspension, and even this seemed fractional. Could the suspension, in fact, be broken!? The motorway journey also showed that the Puma was amazingly responsive, gave a lovely feel through the steering, that it much preferred travelling at 90 than at 70 (a friend owns a very long driveway), that you had to drive the thing the whole time, and that something really, really odd happens if you open a window, or windows, at speed. It gets louder. That’s it. 

Absolutely no risk of my hair looking as if I’d styled it on my ironing board (which is a good thing if you’re a woman), but also absolutely no real movement of air around the cabin either (which is bad). It’s also a little bit weird and made it seemingly difficult to lower the cabin temperature quickly, which was no more than a mild surprise at the time, but something that would prove to be a bigger issue in the summer. However, all things being considered as I pulled off the M25 and onto the A217 and headed back to the B roads that I knew so well.  I was happy with how fresh I still felt behind the wheel and how driving it made me feel. The only problem was, of course, that I was still yet to really get to know the Puma as I’d not had the chance to have a play. 

And then, it dawned on me. (I have a mean IQ of 140 but can still be the dizziest, stupidest person I know, sometimes) Of course, dummy! I’m driving towards roads I’d learned to drive on, roads I’d driven (ragged) some pretty exciting carage around on before - the highlights of which being a Mach 1 Fastback Mustang, a Jaguar E-Type V12 convertable, and a Vauxhall VX 2200 turbo (not at the same time, you understand), and these were roads I still knew very well indeed. The very same roads we were about to be getting to. Tee hee. My grin got a little wider as I pulled up outside my parents’ house and helped unload the car. We’d made the journey down comfortably in a little over two hours and it had just turned 12.30pm and I already knew exactly where I was going to take the Puma to finally get to know it better, later that afternoon.

Later that afternoon

Under the premise that I was going to a garage to check the tyre pressures (which everyone knew was a fib), I drove to a local garage, checked the tyres and engine levels, climbed aboard, checked the lippy, turned the key, and knew that it was finally playtime. Now, I’m not going into detail regarding roads I know and where they are, because they are all roads very similar to the ones you and the whole UK looked at during the Olympics (sponsored by MacDonalds) while cyclists rode up and down them a few times in Surrey (Box Hill), thought looked pretty and then all went to, and frankly, ruined. Let’s just assume we’re talking twisty, black and, sometimes, red asphalt with little traffic (this was over ten years ago, remember), with no horses, no buses, no tractors, no cyclists, no horse-muck and no lorries sort of B-roads, with lots of off-camber corners, frequent and sudden hills and drops, and all surrounded by green Surrey hills with a lush tree canopy. Assume it’s just like that, mainly because that precisely what it is like, and you’re not having it.

So, I pulled out the garage and a few moments later I was pointed down a sleepy B-road doing an easy 40 in fourth. I dropped into second and mashed the accelerator into the carpet for the very first time. It yelped, put its power down, and went. Quicker than I expected, much quicker actually and I’m on the limiter already into third and hard down again. Crikey - this thing PULLS! The throttle response is instant - the 1.7s making a lovely rasp (think Alfasud) through the exhaust and never feels like it’s even close to running out of revs or pull, even when the limiter is hit and I’m changing into fourth when I notice I’m doing 40mph more than I thought I was, which is really far too fast. 

I simply wasn’t expecting this! There’s a corner coming up, so I’m on the brakes hard (which really work, despite only being drums on the back), and I suddenly remember at this belated point that a Puma is front-wheel-drive and that I’m going into a corner which drops away on the left, and that I’m barrelling into it at an alarmingly similar speed to what the rear-wheeled-drive Vauxhall VX Turbo I’d driven could handle, which is basically a Lotus Elise with an Astra GTE engine, gearbox, and Vauxhall shell. 

Oh bloody shit. 

Sudden visions of telephone calls going something like; “Hi Dad! Hi darling! So how’s the test drive going? Brilliant - it’s totally brilliantly brilliant and would you mind just coming and help me pull it out of a tree, please?” wandered about in my head for a bit. Well, until I’d arrived at the corner anyway, and so it was with some trepidation that I guided my inside wheel to the apex, turned hard into the corner, and waited - with some considerable interest - to see what happened next. 

What happened next is why I still drive one, and why nothing this side of a Honda Integra Type-R, or Toyota GT86 would get me out of one - even today. It went around the corner - which actually by then wasn’t a surprise because I could feel the front just tuck in and do it, and it was telling me it was doing it. I simply couldn’t believe how much feedback this little chassis was giving me through the wheel. 

I’d expected it to feel like a hot Fiesta - mainly because that’s all it really is, but this felt special. This was a proper, real, drivers car and I’d never driven a front-wheel-drive chassis which had so much feel, so instant a turn-in, and was so responsive to inputs. This was a chassis which had a level of competence I was simply not expecting, and I swear the bloody thing was almost baiting me. I was throwing it into corners thinking I’d be close to the limits of grip, and coming out the other side with no fuss, no dramatics, with no issues whatsoever other than a vague feeling that the Puma was thinking to itself “that the best you’ve got!?”

Ten minutes later I’m parked up and sitting on a park bench by a pretty duck pond, enjoying a cup of Earl Grey and looking at my Puma and waiting for my brakes to cool down and to stop smelling quite so badly, and I find that just can’t stop smiling. The brakes, which had never been really abused before, were smelling because I’d skimmed off the glaze that had built up on the pads with my heavy use. And I was smiling because I already knew that this little car had far more about it than what I’d thought it would have. 

 I was, frankly, astonished. By a Ford! That afternoon, and a tank-full of fuel later, I returned to my family with a silly smile on my face and a realisation that something had started. That afternoon, on the B-roads of Surrey and West Sussex, I’d gotten to know a car more thoroughly than any other I’d owned, and I just loved the dynamism of the thing. I’d learned that it did eventually have limits, but it’d always let you know you were getting there. If really abused, that it would eventually break away at the rear, but also that this was always very predictable and controllable, as the chassis was naturally so neutral. For a driver, it was an utter delight. It was almost as if someone had designed a car just for me, but I also needed to understand how it was so much better than I’d have ever thought. So I did some reading and some digging, and I discovered why.

I bet you didn’t know...

That a certain Jackie Stewart was part of the Ford team that tweaked the suspension? Yes, that Jackie Stewart. Oh, I can still remember the ubercool Puma ads on TV, with the music and imagines from Bullit superimposed with Steve McQueen driving San Francisco in a Puma, instead of the Mustang, and very clever it was, too. But I thought it all just hype. It seems, sometimes, that sometimes it isn’t.

The Puma, to date, has the following accolades;

1997 - Named Top Gear's car of the year for 'the incredible feeling and driving sensation.'

1999 - Design Council Millennium Products award for 'The first Ford in Britain designed solely on computer and in record time.'

2001 - What Car's Used Sports Car Of The Year- Ford Puma 1.7

2004 - What Car's Best Used Sporting Car of the Year Under £10,000 - Ford Puma 1.7

2011 - What Car's Best 'Gem for under £1000' - Ford Puma 1.7

See? It’s not just me who thinks them special. I think that this little car is the best, small, hard-top coupe ever made. Bar none. The 1.7 engine is an absolute gem and it’s coupled to a gorgeously snicky short-throw box which ratios are just so perfect for the car - although, saying that, fifth could be a tad longer. I’ve often been cruising at 90 (again, on my friends drive) and tried to change up into fifth, to find I’m already in it. However, it’ll happily let you bimble about at 30 in fifth yet very little is faster through the gears at the traffic light dash. Well, at least up to 40, anyway. 

The Puma has a rudimentary traction-control (which is easy to defeat, if not worth the effort), and just puts its power down without fuss or flourish. Part of the reason for this is its lightness (just over 1100 kgs) but this just helps make the Puma as versatile as it is. Keep it out of the vct and drive it like a granny (well, like it’s a Fiesta, then) and it’ll give you 44 mpg and however you drive it you can’t get it below 30. Also, you’ll be amazed at what it will carry. With the back seats down, I’ve had a mountain bike, two very large and heavy hifi speakers (Kef Concord MkIII’s), and most of my record collection (which is vast) aboard, and I really couldn’t even feel any difference. 

Part 2 will be published tomorrow morning