Showing posts with label Bradley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bradley. Show all posts

21 Jun 2013

Does Anyone Know the Number for Petrolheads Anonymous?

I may have a problem. I’m not sure whether or not it’s a serious one, but I believe I have a problem nonetheless. Now, before you start posting comments below suggesting for me to begin meeting with a personal therapist, allow me to explain myself. I’m not insane, and I don’t have any psychological issues. Well, there may be one. You see, I have something that I like to call petrolheadolism, and that might be causing a few problems.

I first realized that I may have petrolheadolism about one week ago. It was the beginning of June, and amidst the sneezing and cursing Claritin for what I believed to have been false advertisements, I was trying to study for finals. And when I say trying, I mean trying to memorize at least one vocabulary word before I found myself having read another twenty pages in my classic car encyclopedia.

While in the middle of the thirtieth study break in fifteen minutes, I was flipping through the pages of The Encyclopedia of Classic Cars when I saw what was at the bottom of page 424. In a luscious red paint was a beautiful 1980s Saab 900. The car was so beautiful, in fact, that what woke me from my daze was the sound of my own jaw hitting the floor. The first thought that came to mind? ‘I want one.’

Seconds later I found myself scanning countless forums and classifieds as I searched for the selling price of a 1985 Saab 900 Turbo. What I say was very encouraging, 900 Turbos in great condition were selling at about £2,000, and more than 900,000 cars produced meant there shouldn’t be a shortage of 900s.

But there was a problem. In the real world, buying a 1980s Swedish car is not necessarily the smartest decision one can make in their life. For example, horsepower figures that you may have poured over as a kid will have decreased over the years. The car may have been advertised at a few grand in the classifieds, but a few more zeroes are expected so that the car will work properly when you want it to.

And it’s not just the Swedish cars that cause this sort of stress. As petrolheads, many of us have had to experience the taxing trials of owning cars that, while greatly enjoyable, were extraordinarily stressful to maintain. Many Italian cars are notorious for their high running costs. Air conditioning, transmission, engine reliability, at some point they all seem to hit the fan.

But that is what defines petrolheadolism; willingly buying cars that you know will require servicing that causes a loss of hair simply because you admire everything about it. Although the wife may be in complete disagreement and your friends may question your sanity, you made the decision to buy the car because you love the way it looks, the way it sounds, the way it drives, the way it is.

It’s devilishly simple to buy cars such as the Toyota Camry purely for their reliability but the fact of the matter is that there is nothing special about such a car. That is what makes a petrolhead and your everyday car buyer different; a standard buyer is only worried about getting from one place to the next, whereas an enthusiast wants to enjoy the journey there. You can’t enjoy the journey in a Camry.

So, if you’re like me and your petrolheadolism is causing you to think you may be preparing yourself for a very poor decision, you’re not. As cheesy as it may sound, embrace your petrolheadolism because if you are an enthusiast, it’s actually preparing you to make the best decision you’ve ever made. Happy motoring.

Article by Bradley Credit. Take a look at Bradley's site fullthrottletimes.wordpress.com

20 May 2013

Call the Coast Guard! Lamborghini's gone overboard

By now, most of you have probably seen the Lamborghini Egoista. Many of you may have already gotten the job of memorizing the specifications out of the way. Some of you may love it, some of you may hate it, and some of you may have no clue about how you feel. If you are one of those people: welcome to the club.

Since they ceased making tractors and started making cars after Ferruccio Lamborghini’s argument with Ferrari’s customer service, Lamborghini has established itself as an eccentric super sports car manufacturer. I guess you could say that if Ferrari, Aston Martin, Lamborghini, and BMW were a group of twelve-year-olds, Lamborghini would be the kid with the extremely long hair who refused to cut it. In other words, Lamborghini has long been the wild one when it comes to design.

But now it seems that Lambo may be taking it a step too far. As if the Veneno was not already nudging the mental capacities of car enthusiasts in terms of design and purpose, the Egoista is Lamborghini saying that they could care less. Honestly, this car is as difficult to understand as it is to pronounce the car’s name (which, in case you did not know, is pronounced e-go-e-stah and means ‘selfish’ in Italian).

When I first saw the car, I was initially part of the group that hated it. I argued for an ample period of time with non-car enthusiast friends who had no idea of what Lambo has been up to lately and thought the car looks awesome. But after spending some time running my eyes of every square pixel of pictures of the car, I can announce that I absolutely have no idea what to think of it.

Lamborghini says the car’s atypical design was inspired by an Apache attack helicopter. And you can see that inspiration quite clearly, as the roof and windshield, which we’ll have to call ‘canopy’ for the sake of being factual, not only resemble that of the Apache chopper but also lift up like an Apache’s canopy would. There is even a heads up display, which may disappoint owners as unfortunately it can't lock onto the slow hybrid ahead and blast it out of the way.

However, as confused as I may be I do still struggle to understand why Lamborghini may have thought that this car was a good idea, especially if it is supposed to celebrate Lambo’s 50th anniversary. 

Honestly, it is hard to comprehend how a car company could make something as flowingly beautiful and elegant as the Miura, then turn around and make, well, a mobile triangle. Part of me even wishes that über-conventional Audi would have stepped in and said something.

I guess I’ll never truly understand this car. I cannot imagine it being on the road - for flying at low altitude at over 700 mph seems to be more realistic to me. And I’m not entirely sure of the point of it, other than being a fashion statement, either. 

 Really, 600 horsepower and no missile launchers? I do not know if there is anything that could possibly allow me to get this car. And I suppose that as many valid points I bring up, arguments with friends will always end up fruitless. Maybe they should’ve put machine guns on it.

Article by Bradley Credit.  Take a look at Bradley's site fullthrottletimes.wordpress.com